Who’s #IranDeal’s $10M Bag Man?

Bundles of $100 BillsWhoa…

The indispensable Andrew C. McCarthy* over at National Review has once again asked the $64,000 question. Or in this case, the $10,000,000 questionWho got that sweeeeeet tip?

You’ve doubtlessly heard about the $400M in palettes of cash “leverage” given to the Iranians to get our hostages back. Well, like they say in every infomercial ever “But wait! There’s more!”  Shortly after that news broke, an enterprising New York Sun reporter, Claudia Rosett (therefore making her indispensable) combed through the shoebox of federal government receipts to find an additional (illegally structured!) $1.3B!

While “the most transparent administration in history” continues to insist that this transaction is completely legit, Claudia could not find the 13 transfers of $99,999,999.99 by searching for “Iran” listings in the judgment fund. Acknowledgment of payments to Iran is nowhere to be found. Instead, she happened upon this $1.3 billion (minus the 13 cents) by locating cases in which the State Department was a party.

“But wait! There’s even MORE!”

And with that, another intriguing wrinkle emerged: a 14th unexplained transfer by Treasury, on State’s behalf, in the amount of $10 million — bringing the total to $1.31 billion.

Whereupon Mr. McCarthy asks the aforementioned $64,000  $10,000,000 question:

Is that extra $10 million a sweetener for someone in this deal?

Good question.

Look – This entire thing is like if George W. Bush paid off the Bin Ladens. It’s UNTHINKABLE a President would do this but here we are. Read it. And be horrified.

Why Is Obama Stonewalling on Details of the $1.7 Billion in Iransom PayoffsBy Andrew C. McCarthy — August 27, 2016

*Mr. McCarthy is the lawyer who put away “The Blind Sheik” for the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The man knows bad guys and bag men when he sees them.

Want Rice or Beans w/that Taqiyya?

Oh… Wait… That’s taco, not taqiyya…

I always get that wrong.

Kinda like the progressive left, or as we like to call them, The New York Times Editorial Board, MSNBC, NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, and the modern Democratic party.

This morning’s example of the survival instinct being bred out of them, is the big, splashy, feature NYT editorial insisting the Muslim Brotherhood is just misunderstood, and gosh, darn, golly, if we’d just relax and listen to the NY-DC-corridor elites we’d see they’re really just a cute and cuddly as a little puppy!

Osama bin Laden was a member of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Pfft. Forget that part.

I posted a comment, which I seriously doubt will get published, but I thought it was worth sharing (It’s below the line at the bottom of this rant!).  Understanding my comment doesn’t require reading the entire editorial that inspired it, but it’s worth a skim to just get an understanding, if you don’t have one, of how human evolution has arrived at the point that half the f*cking country has had their survival instincts bred out of them.

I’m not kidding.  I’m as serious as a heart attack.  This is the same party (the Democrats) who wants to repeal the 2nd amendment, not only for us, but for cops, too!  No, really, they want to r-e-p-e-a-l it, but, in the shorter term, they’ll just settle for disarming the police.  This is a real thing.  Happened just recently.  Really.  Because… Everybody knows if guns are illegal, criminals will obey the law and charm will stop a bullet, right?  A good, sensitivity-trained cop in a “softer uniform” can just talk the perp insane on PCP out of killing him, right?  RIGHT?

We literally have more guns that people in this country.  300 million+ guns.  (If that seems impossible, just think about it for just a split second:  Do you know, or know of, anyone with a gun who owns just one?  Of course not.  Most people who own guns own several.)  So in order to believe this fantasy of a repealed 2nd amendment gun-free America you would have to believe that all of those weapons evaporate.  Magically.  Just… POOF.  GONE.  Which is ridiculous. No?  Okay… So now you have to imagine that everyone in possession of a gun will turn it in.  Everyone.  E-v-e-r-y-o-n-e.  Everyone will just obey the law, like a good little serf.

You’d have to believe in unicorn-farts made of gold dust to believe that, but, then, I’m not a liberal.

But I digress.

Back to those adorable rascals, the Muslim Brotherhood and their defenders at the NYT Editorial Board.  We began this rant on how we are to believe the MB “renounced violence in the 1970’s.”


Here’s my answer to that pile of steaming poo, which isn’t likely to see the light of day in the comments section at the Times:

(UPDATE:  They must have someone new on the comments desk this morning.  They actually published it.)

From the UK’s Guardian, May 2, 2011, right after OBL’s killing, regarding the ‘peaceful’ MB:

“Egypt’s influential Muslim Brotherhood condemned the ‘assassination’ of Osama bin Laden, claiming anyone accused of a crime should be put on trial.”

The Muslim Brotherhood is not benign.

They are not our friends.

They lie.

The Iranian mullahs “denounce” violence too. While there are many forms of Islam & the MB, the Egyptian version, the Shia, the Sunni, etc., they all operate under the umbrella of the same “rules,” which include taqiyya = lying, even if it is “against the faith,” because the purpose of taqiyya is to pacify the infidel long enough to finish the job, as it were.

Related to this is the politically correct, and frankly suicidal, western practice of obfuscation; making a big fuss about “core al Qaeda” or how one faction is fighting the other so, based on our western good-guy/bad-guy paradigm, surely one side must be aligned with our interests. When it comes to Islam all bets are off. The paradigm is useless. These people lie. Just because we do too doesn’t make them any more credible. In fact, because it is in the service of Islam it is worse, because while we Americans lie for all kinds of reasons, when their leaders lie to the west it is with a sword behind their backs and the righteousness of the cause to wield it upon our necks.

IRS & O’s Terrorist Bro

The link to the article below, IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother by Eileen F. Toplansky at American Thinker was broken for most of the morning. I have never had this experience at this site, and I read it several times a day. After six years of links going missing, getting corrupted, and websites & even search engines being scrubbed, tweaked, and manipulated, I don’t don’t think it’s paranoid to assume the break was not an accident. Given this, I took it upon myself to just cut and paste it, in its entirety here. Too little good, sourced, solid writing has been done about Barack Obama’s familial (and non-familial) ties to criminals and terrorists. Walid Shoebat and a few others have been tireless, but howling in the wind, I’m afraid. Normally cutting & pasting someone’s work would be a bad thing. In this case, I regard it as helping the cause via safe-keeping. Let me be clear: I had nothing to do with this article, don’t know a soul involved/mentioned in it, and stand to gain absolutely nothing by preserving it here. I just don’t want it going down the digital rabbit hole.

IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother

In April 2012, Indiana’s news station WTHR conducted a “Tax Loophole” investigation that attracted the attention of millions of Americans.  They discovered “a massive tax loophole that provides billions of dollars in tax credits to undocumented workers.”

Although a program known as the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) was supposed to be “primarily used by undocumented workers to follow the law and file income taxes in the United States” the ongoing IRS scandal linked “ITIN fraud to billions in lost taxpayer dollars” and the IRS was “forced to reform the ITIN program at the start of 2013.”

Didn’t quite happen.

As is the usual scenario in this administration, the IRS pulled another fast one because according to Patrick Howley, the “Internal Revenue Service [has] quietly changed regulations to allow more undocumented immigrants to keep their taxpayer status through a program that is rife with fraud and abuse.”  In short, “ensuring that only qualified individuals receive an ITIN” is a dim to non-existent prospect.

In addition, in the IRS ongoing case known as True the Vote(TTV) v. IRS the court “rejected an attempt by the conservative Tea Party group to have the court appoint a forensics expert to find Lois Lerner’s missing emails and documents.” The basis for this decision was the judge’s ruling that no “irreparable harm” had occurred.

But in January 2014 Walid Shoebat unearthed the information that a jihadist was granted USA tax exempt status 26-2461343 by Lois Lerner while conservative groups and Jewish groups were thwarted in their attempts to gain this same status. And this is where things begin to get very interesting.

Who might this jihadist be?  None other than Barack Hussein Obama’s brother Malik Obama.

The Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) was established in 2008 by Abon’go Malik Obama, the half-brother of the President of the United States.  According to Discover the Networks, “Abon’go, a Kenyan-born Muslim, created the foundation in memory of his and President Obama’s biological father.”  But

...from 2008-11, BHOF operated illegally as a nonprofit group and falsely claimed tax-exempt status—for which it had not yet formally applied. The foundation finally submitted its 2010 application for nonprofit, tax-exempt status on May 23, 2011; seven days later, it submitted its filings for 2008 and 2009. Within just one month of these filings—on June 26, 2011—Lois Lerner, the senior official who headed the IRS's tax-exempt organizations office, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to BHOF.

Consider that many conservative groups were intentionally forced by Lerner’s office to wait more than three years for the same status. Yet Obama’s African relative sails through without a hitch. Quite a stark contrast.

That is infuriating on the surface but consider the greater ramifications.

Eight months ago, Shoebat unearths the fact that Malik Obama is Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO) of Sudan’s Omar Al-Bashir, an international criminal who is wanted on seven counts for genocide and crimes against humanity.  Barack’s half-brother is officially a fundraiser for the IDO.  Thus, Malik Obama helps to lead an organization that “collects funds and sends them directly to Hamas.”

In fact, “IDO has raised funds for Gaza relief.”  These so-called relief funds have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and an Al-Qaeda bank that was founded by Osama bin Laden.”

Consequently, Shoebat insists that Cleta Mitchell, the attorney for True the Vote should publicize the Malik Obama connection.  This would “show that, indeed, the IRS aided and abetted terror funding” and would demolish Judge Reggie Walton’s point that “irreparable harm” did not occur.

Considering all this, it is not particularly surprising when Barack Hussein Obama favors Hamas over the Israelis during the current attacks on the Jewish state.  A recent Gulf News report of June 2014 “reveals cooperation between Washington and Brotherhood.”  As a result the shift toward “Islamic ascendancy” is flourishing.

Armin Rosen at Business Insider maintains that the United States is funding a designated terror group and that Obama is bending U.S. “rules to subsidize a group” that is considered a terrorist organization. The nefarious connections appear to be quite deep and interconnected.  Following the money and familial connections with Obama explains a great deal about the 44th President’s allegiances.

IRS continues to stonewall; Americans cannot get straight answers from their government leaders, but, to be sure, illegals and terrorists are riding high in Barack Hussein Obama’s America.

The scandals simmer; Christians continue to be murdered worldwide; Yesidi genocide is ongoing, and screams of “kill the Jews” reverberate, but on Saturday, August 9, 2014, Obama “fled Washington for his familiar spot on Martha’s Vineyard for a two-week summer vacation.”  We shall, I am sure, hear all about his ice cream stops and golf exploits.

Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com


Fragment of a Farrrrout Conspiracy Theory

Okay, so I get up early this morning and turn on the radio. Not just any radio, but my handy-dandy iPad internet radio, using one of the great, free apps of all time, especially as it relates to internet radio listening, TuneIn, and catch a little Michael Medved.  I’ve only recently stumbled on him, though I’d been aware of him for quite some time.  If I’m up early on weekends (which I usually am), I can find a best of Medved on a station out of Sacto.  The guy’s pitch perfect on free market capitalism.  Beyond that, I don’t know much about him, but he let fly about 60 seconds of something this morning I wish I’d rewound and listened to again before I lost the cache of it.  It went by fast, and my apologies for my utter ignorance on these matters, but it was just so damned interesting I had to share.  Again, my apologies to him and to everyone reading this who know way more about these matters than I do and that’s gotta be everyone.

The conspiracy theory goes that the reason the CIA-hatched-op to get Bin Laden chose the name of the getting of him as Geronimo is that the original Geronimo, you know, the Indian, has a place of distinct honor among those in the know.  Seems his skull, like, the real, actual skull, is in the custody of the heavily CIA steeped Skull & Bones society, thus the name, and that the plan was to get Bin Laden’s skull and make that the new grail of sorts, of this secret society.

Like I said, I know zip, nada, nothing about Skull & Bones, and only caught a fragment of this on Medved’s best-of this morning, so who the hell knows.  I just thought it was fun.

BTW:  He’s got a couple of books I just started reading and they’re brilliant. BOTH knock down progressive propaganda on capitalism. They are without a doubt the best, most concise, most focused, and undeniably sensible on the subject I’ve ever seen.  I’m looking forward to finishing them both.



Obama just announced he would NOT release a photo of the dead Osama Bin Laden because he’s “not a trophy.”  

Okay… but Obama said that the reason he chose an incredibly risky Navy Seal incursion was so that he could secure PROOF he was dead, and presumably, to limit civilian casualities.  Taken together, there’s certainly a reasonable case to be made for that approach.

But, if after all that, you’re not going to release the damned photo, then what you did was choose the safety of Osama Bin Laden’s loved ones OVER the safety of AMERICAN loved ones, namely, the NAVY SEALS, who, at top pay grade, make $55k per year.

Guess it ain’t much to lose one, huh Mr. President?

If you change your story yet again, and tell us is was to secure the so-called treasure trove of intelligence,  I’m sure MSNBC and the rest of the whore-media will help you skate away on that one.

…I’m disgusted…

He’d better find the secret to life, the God-particle, the secret to alchemy, Atlantis and friggin’ Jimmy Hoffa in that hut to justify risking American fannies for “proof” NOBODY gets to see.  We’re just supposed to trust the king, huh?  Didn’t we quit England because of this sh*t?  

The intelligence they gathered had better be good, because so far, it’s all been about “him” needing proof, that only “he” can see, that he will take a victory lap for in lower Manhattan tomorrow.

Oh, and heads up to the clueless media:  President Bush declined the invitation to join Obama at Ground Zero tomorrow because he has… Ready?  Here it comes.  We’ll take it slow…