We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ D.O.J., America.

DOJ CLOSED DUE TO CORRUPTION small copyI love this idea. Love, love, love, love, LOVE this idea. I present this article to you from The American Thinker in part, but heartily recommend it in its entirety. Bolds are mine.


May 22, 2016
Abolish the Department of Justice
By Bruce Walker

The Obama Justice Department has revealed its final descent into naked politics and totalitarian bullying. Lois Lerner and Hillary Clinton, two transparently guilty criminals whose crimes are compounded by the fact that both are also lawyers, will face no indictments and no prosecution. The corrupt bosses of the Veterans Administration likewise face no sanction at all despite the manifest criminality of their actions.

Lying under oath to Congress, failing to comply with Freedom of Information Act requests, conspiring to obstruct justice, and many other clear wrongdoings permeate almost every single crevice of the Obama administration, and yet no one who matters has faced any trouble from the Department of Justice. …

The hyper-politicization of the Department of Justice by the left has been used unceasingly as a bludgeon against conservatives, Christians, and constitutionalists in America… (and) there is no real cure at the federal level. …The only effective solution is to do what may make many gasp, even many conservatives, and simply abolish the United States Department of Justice

How, then, would federal laws and regulations be enforced?

States have full authority to do just that, and Congress can return to state courts and to state authorities the enforcement of federal laws. This is perfectly proper, as many federal laws are already enforceable by state officers. Congress can confer on states the right to enforce its laws, and, indeed, it can confer upon state courts exclusive jurisdiction over “federal questions,” with the single caveat that the Supreme Court would have appellate jurisdiction. This would solve many problems.

…It would mean folks like Lerner and Clinton, whose violations occurred in several states, would not be able to fix the system so that they are immune to prosecution. The powerful would suddenly find it impossible to game the system with fifty different states able to prosecute offenses.

…Returning the prosecution of federal offenses to state criminal justice agencies would have the practical effect of also devolving power back to the states. …This provides a practical check on the abuse of federal power… The diffusion of power that today is so concentrated in a few hands in Washington would be another vital and happy result of devolving back to states the power to enforce federal laws.

The president, of course, would still have the constitutional duty to see that the laws are faithfully executed, but nothing in the Constitution says that he must be given an army of federal bureaucrats to do that …Abolishing the Department of Justice is a good place to begin the Herculean task of cleaning this horrid mess.

###

RUH-ROH… “RICO” I.R.S. Charges?

Whoa… I’ve been checking and checking and checking, several times a day, since Friday when the latest IRS missing emails news-dump took place and BOOM! Was it worth the wait!!!!!! The New York Observer‘s Sydney Powell, who before I started following the I.R.S scandal, I had never heard of, has emerged, in my humble opinion, as head & shoulders, far, far above all others, the singularly most thoughtful, knowledgeable, thorough chronicler-analyst on this massive abuse of power. Here is her latest, in full.

Will Orange Be the New Black for IRS Chief Lois Lerner?

Lois Lerner (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images)The IRS claims that more computers belonging to Lois Lerner’s colleagues crashed. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images)

Late last Friday afternoon, in a blatant “late news dump” to avoid making headlines about the Internal Revenue’s witch hunt against conservative non-profits, the IRS disclosed to Congress that five more of the IRS computers containing relevant records had mysteriously crashed. Those computers belonged to colleagues of Lois Lerner, whose conduct is at the center of the investigation.

Perhaps there is some strange computer virus that selectively trashes records inconvenient to incumbents, like the “glitch” that erased part of Nixon’s tapes. How else to explain the fact that this is the fourth announcement of an ever-expanding computer calamity connected to Lois Lerner to emerge from the IRS?  First it was just Lerner’s computer that was affected, then those of her closest co-conspirators, then “no more than twenty” computers, and now an ever larger batch of burned out workstations.

Even more interesting, the IRS has apparently not yet shared this newest tidbit with Judge Emmet G. Sullivan, the distinguished and courageous jurist presiding overJudicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Judge Sullivan has made the most progress so far in uncovering the conspiracy among Lerner and friends to target, harass and illegally obtain information from conservative non-profit organizations to benefit Mr. Obama’s reelection campaign—for which the law firm of Ms. Lerner’s husband, Michael Miles, also hosted a voter registration event.

Tom Fitton, President of Judicial Watch, told the Observer: “The belated admission of more supposed missing IRS evidence shows this Obama administration is absolutely contemptuous of Judge Sullivan.  Judicial Watch lawyers are preparing to ask the court this week for relief in light of the Obama administration’s continuing efforts to thwart Judge Sullivan’s orders. In the least, we plan to request discovery to get past this Nixonian obstruction.”

Some of the IRS emails, which miraculously survived long enough to be produced, expose that Ms. Lerner and her comrades also corruptly requested donor information from conservative charities for a “secret research project.” The IRS has also admitted illegallyusing and disclosing that information.

We broke the news last week that Lerner and the IRS wiped and destroyed her Blackberry and all its content even after the congressional investigation began. The IRS reluctantly disclosed that information only becauseJudge Emmet G. Sullivan didn’t accept the carefully crafted declarations in the agency’s first response. As we predicted—and thankfully for the American public—he pushed for more information. He required the IRS to submit additional declarations, answering even more specific questions. Had he not done so, we wouldn’t know Lerner and the IRS also destroyed her Blackberry. The IRS did not make any mention of her Blackberry in any of its many prior filings—much less in its initial sworn declarations.

We have no report yet from the Treasury Inspector General, and at the rate the IRS officials keep proving it’s own prior testimony perjurious or wrong, it’s an ever moving target. Indeed, according to the AP, “J. Russell George, the Treasury inspector general for tax administration, said his investigation is ongoing, with facts ‘still coming to light.’”

While the agency continues to blame “computer crashes” for the now more than 20 people whose emails are “missing,” no IRS official has yet to identify when or how each computer crashed—much less why. We know Lois Lerner’s hard drive, which was “scratched” only a matter of days after receiving a letter from Congress requesting her emails. The IRS then destroyed it. The IRS followed a year later with the destruction of her unimpaired Blackberry containing emails for the same period. As we reported first, it made no effort whatsoever to obtain information from the Blackberry—despite being well into the Congressional inquiry. That is obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence—worse than the conduct for which Leslie Caldwell, now head of the Criminal Division of the Department of Justice, destroyed Arthur Andersen LLP and its 85,000 jobs.

Any number of federal criminal statutes might apply to these facts, including Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 1505—Obstruction of proceedings before department, agencies and committees; and Section 1519—Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations. Section 1505 is also a predicate offense for the federal Racketeering Statute, Section 1961, which provides that a “pattern of racketeering activity” can be proved by committing two predicate acts. These statutes are punishable by terms of imprisonment varying from five to twenty years.

While Lois Lerner and her husband vacationed in Nantucket, Judge Sullivan gaveMagistrate Judge Facciola until September 20 to “assist the parties” in finding the emails from other sources. The IRS has admitted there is a massive back-up of all federal emails, but prefers to continue to obstruct justice rather than go to the trouble of finding the emails. I wouldn’t want to be the Department of Justice lawyer making thatargument to Judge Emmet Sullivan.

When Judicial Watch asks for more discovery, Judge Sullivan could order the IRS to go to the back-up data immediately. He could also have a third party retrieve the information from the servers. The IRS has no credibility.

So yet again, the IRS simply creates more questions and at least five more reasons for Judge Sullivan to name a special prosecutor. When did each of the now more than 20 computer crashes occur—by date and time? How could that possibly happen? Why did the IRS prematurely cancel its longstanding contract for backup? Why did it take this long to find out that 5 more had “crashed?” Where is the Blackberry or other device for each of the persons whose computer crashed? What servers are implicated? Whose resignations are forthcoming? Why is Koskinen still there? Who is on Emmet Sullivan’s short list to be the special prosecutor?

Evidence is mounting by the day that Lois Lerner and her co-conspirators abused the power of the sovereign, violated the trust of the people, lied to Congress, destroyed documents and evidence of their wrongdoing, and violated multiple criminal statutes.

With the revelations of this last week, Lois Lerner and the IRS might as well be sitting on a ticking bomb . . . and it’s about to explode.

Sidney Powell worked in the Department of Justice for 10 years and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals. She served nine U.S. Attorneys from both political parties and is the author of Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.

IRS & O’s Terrorist Bro

The link to the article below, IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother by Eileen F. Toplansky at American Thinker was broken for most of the morning. I have never had this experience at this site, and I read it several times a day. After six years of links going missing, getting corrupted, and websites & even search engines being scrubbed, tweaked, and manipulated, I don’t don’t think it’s paranoid to assume the break was not an accident. Given this, I took it upon myself to just cut and paste it, in its entirety here. Too little good, sourced, solid writing has been done about Barack Obama’s familial (and non-familial) ties to criminals and terrorists. Walid Shoebat and a few others have been tireless, but howling in the wind, I’m afraid. Normally cutting & pasting someone’s work would be a bad thing. In this case, I regard it as helping the cause via safe-keeping. Let me be clear: I had nothing to do with this article, don’t know a soul involved/mentioned in it, and stand to gain absolutely nothing by preserving it here. I just don’t want it going down the digital rabbit hole.

IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother

In April 2012, Indiana’s news station WTHR conducted a “Tax Loophole” investigation that attracted the attention of millions of Americans.  They discovered “a massive tax loophole that provides billions of dollars in tax credits to undocumented workers.”

Although a program known as the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) was supposed to be “primarily used by undocumented workers to follow the law and file income taxes in the United States” the ongoing IRS scandal linked “ITIN fraud to billions in lost taxpayer dollars” and the IRS was “forced to reform the ITIN program at the start of 2013.”

Didn’t quite happen.

As is the usual scenario in this administration, the IRS pulled another fast one because according to Patrick Howley, the “Internal Revenue Service [has] quietly changed regulations to allow more undocumented immigrants to keep their taxpayer status through a program that is rife with fraud and abuse.”  In short, “ensuring that only qualified individuals receive an ITIN” is a dim to non-existent prospect.

In addition, in the IRS ongoing case known as True the Vote(TTV) v. IRS the court “rejected an attempt by the conservative Tea Party group to have the court appoint a forensics expert to find Lois Lerner’s missing emails and documents.” The basis for this decision was the judge’s ruling that no “irreparable harm” had occurred.

But in January 2014 Walid Shoebat unearthed the information that a jihadist was granted USA tax exempt status 26-2461343 by Lois Lerner while conservative groups and Jewish groups were thwarted in their attempts to gain this same status. And this is where things begin to get very interesting.

Who might this jihadist be?  None other than Barack Hussein Obama’s brother Malik Obama.

The Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) was established in 2008 by Abon’go Malik Obama, the half-brother of the President of the United States.  According to Discover the Networks, “Abon’go, a Kenyan-born Muslim, created the foundation in memory of his and President Obama’s biological father.”  But

...from 2008-11, BHOF operated illegally as a nonprofit group and falsely claimed tax-exempt status—for which it had not yet formally applied. The foundation finally submitted its 2010 application for nonprofit, tax-exempt status on May 23, 2011; seven days later, it submitted its filings for 2008 and 2009. Within just one month of these filings—on June 26, 2011—Lois Lerner, the senior official who headed the IRS's tax-exempt organizations office, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to BHOF.

Consider that many conservative groups were intentionally forced by Lerner’s office to wait more than three years for the same status. Yet Obama’s African relative sails through without a hitch. Quite a stark contrast.

That is infuriating on the surface but consider the greater ramifications.

Eight months ago, Shoebat unearths the fact that Malik Obama is Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO) of Sudan’s Omar Al-Bashir, an international criminal who is wanted on seven counts for genocide and crimes against humanity.  Barack’s half-brother is officially a fundraiser for the IDO.  Thus, Malik Obama helps to lead an organization that “collects funds and sends them directly to Hamas.”

In fact, “IDO has raised funds for Gaza relief.”  These so-called relief funds have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and an Al-Qaeda bank that was founded by Osama bin Laden.”

Consequently, Shoebat insists that Cleta Mitchell, the attorney for True the Vote should publicize the Malik Obama connection.  This would “show that, indeed, the IRS aided and abetted terror funding” and would demolish Judge Reggie Walton’s point that “irreparable harm” did not occur.

Considering all this, it is not particularly surprising when Barack Hussein Obama favors Hamas over the Israelis during the current attacks on the Jewish state.  A recent Gulf News report of June 2014 “reveals cooperation between Washington and Brotherhood.”  As a result the shift toward “Islamic ascendancy” is flourishing.

Armin Rosen at Business Insider maintains that the United States is funding a designated terror group and that Obama is bending U.S. “rules to subsidize a group” that is considered a terrorist organization. The nefarious connections appear to be quite deep and interconnected.  Following the money and familial connections with Obama explains a great deal about the 44th President’s allegiances.

IRS continues to stonewall; Americans cannot get straight answers from their government leaders, but, to be sure, illegals and terrorists are riding high in Barack Hussein Obama’s America.

The scandals simmer; Christians continue to be murdered worldwide; Yesidi genocide is ongoing, and screams of “kill the Jews” reverberate, but on Saturday, August 9, 2014, Obama “fled Washington for his familiar spot on Martha’s Vineyard for a two-week summer vacation.”  We shall, I am sure, hear all about his ice cream stops and golf exploits.

Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com

~~~

7/10/2014 = IRS JUSTICE!

I slept in this fine Saturday morning in June.

Who knew it was Christmas??????

I got up this morning and what do I see before me in the very news first story I click?  The beautiful black visage of one Emmett Sullivan – THE FEDERAL JUDGE WHO WILL PUT LERNER, HOLDER, AND GOD-WILLING, OBAMA IN HANDCUFFS!!!!!  Long story short:  via a PRIVATELY fought lawsuit in the District over those “missing” emails, the case will come before Judge Sullivan on July 10th.  Judge Sullivan, educated at Howard fercryingoutloud, appointed by Clinton, and because he has that beautiful black skin & pedigree UTTERLY ABOVE ACCUSATIONS of… wait for it… “RAAAAAAACIST”… can appoint… wait for it… A SPECIAL PROSECTOR!!!!!! to HOUND THOSE BASTARDS STRAIGHT INTO THE TONGS OF THE HOT HELL THEY SO RICHLY DESERVE!!!!!!!! I am so RIDICULOUSLY happy about this I can’t even describe it.  And to top it all off, my husband and I are going out on a date tonight to a new Mexican place! AND, just as a bonus, Judge Sullivan will scare the living daylights out of that tribe of scum July 10th, one day before my birthday!!!!!

Life is very, very, very, good!

See the good news in its entirety via The New York Observer below!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BREAKING: Meet Emmet Sullivan, IRS Judge Who Once Sicced a Special Prosecutor on DOJ

Lerner, Holder, Obama: Are You Packing Your Bags?
Americans are appalled over the false testimony of four consecutive IRS Commissioners, Lois Lerner’s countless acts of malfeasance, and the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups and specific individuals, among them Senator Grassley. The ultimate outrage came over the lame, intellectually insulting assertions that all of the most relevant emails have gone missing from multiple IRS computers at the same time.

Today, Judicial Watch found a federal judge who has the integrity and fortitude to seek Justice—and this isn’t his first whack at the Department of Justice either. Enter Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia. Mark July 10 in RED on your calendars.

Now, “Internal Revenue Service officials will have to explain to a federal judge July 10 why the tax agency didn’t inform the court that Lois Lerner’s emails had been lost,” the Washington Examiner reports.

Earlier today, attorneys for Judicial Watch sought a courtroom status conference “as soon as possible to discuss the IRS’s failure to fulfill its duties to this court under the law, as well as other ramifications of this lawsuit.” It took Judge Sullivan just a few hours to grant the hearing.

Now the IRS will have to talk to Judge Sullivan about all this—and he has the power to do something about it.

Judge Sullivan is the judge who held federal prosecutors in contempt, dismissed an unjust indictment against a United States Senator, and publicly excoriated the Department of Justice. He also had the moral conviction, courage and gumption to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Justice Department and the individual prosecutors.

The IRS, the White House, and the DOJ have a lot of explaining to do (and some emails to locate). The Washington Examiner reports that “No mention was made in that production of the lost Lerner emails, even though the original Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed in May 2013 specifically sought them. Judicial Watch further noted that ‘although IRS had knowledge of the missing Lois Lerner emails and of the other IRS officials, it materially omitted any mention of the missing records’ in an April 30 status update on its document production.”

Emmet G. Sullivan, a graduate of Howard University and Howard Law who was appointed by President Clinton, is one of the heroes of my new book, Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. Judge Sullivan ordered an independent investigation of the Department of Justice, which revealed its corrupted prosecution of United States Senator Ted Stevens.

In the book, I write, “An experienced trial judge, Sullivan was a distinguished man and widely held in high regard. He was no ordinary federal judge; he had worked hard all his life on several different courts and had been appointed by three presidents representing both political parties. . . . He had great respect for the rule of law and strived to apply it equally and fairly in all cases in his courtroom.”

In the Stevens case, Judge Sullivan publicly upbraided the government lawyers before an overflow courtroom, “In nearly 25 years on the bench, I’ve never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I’ve seen in this case. . . . When the government does not meet its obligations to turn over evidence, the system falters.”

Judge Sullivan was taking the extraordinary step of appointing a special prosecutor. He chose highly respected DC attorney Henry Schuelke III to investigate the prosecutors for possible criminal charges. The judge ordered the department to preserve all of its files, electronic correspondence—everything—and cooperate fully in the investigation, including providing Schuelke access to investigative files and all witnesses.

Yesterday, Lois Lerner’s troubles seemed so far away, goes the old song. Now it looks as though they’re here to stay. . . .

Emmet G. Sullivan is one judge who knows a cover-up when he sees one. He has seen this movie before. On July 10, someone should sell admission to the courtroom and set up concession booths outside.

Sidney Powell worked in the Department of Justice for 10 years and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals. She served nine US Attorneys from both political parties and is the author of  Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.