Be An American or Be IN America?

I’ve awakened to a lot of bad news since 2008.  Shocking, even.  About a half- dozen times I’ve felt sucker-punched.  Physically sick and slack-jawed at what I have read.

Add this to the list.

Drudge Splash JPG

When you click on the link it takes you to a piece by Katie Pavlich who makes me ashamed of how stupid I was at her age!  I admire her clarity and courage very much!  I don’t think she’s yet 30, and when I think about how mush-brained I was just drinkin’ and spinning records back then I cringe.  Honest-to-God!  There are a lot of very impressive young people (listen to this 50 year old!) who are very well read and grounded on our Founding Principles and it’s very exciting to see.  Ms. Pavlich is one of those young thinkers and I can’t think of a time when I’ve encountered her work when I haven’t learned something or come away better for the experience.


Obama Administration Strips Requirement to Defend The United States From Citizenship Oath
7/22/2015 1:45:00 PM – Katie Pavlich

The United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has “clarified” requirements for individuals becoming naturalized citizens by stripping out the requirement of defending the United States through military service.

“Effective July 21, 2015, new guidance (PA-2015-001) in the USCIS Policy Manual clarifies the eligibility requirements for modifications to the Oath of Allegiance. Reciting the Oath is part of the naturalization process. Candidates for citizenship normally declare that they will “bear arms on behalf of the United States” and “perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States” when required by the law. A candidate may be eligible to exclude these two clauses based on religious training and belief or a conscientious objection,” an email from USCIS clarifying the requirements states (bolding is mine).

The new guidance:

-May be eligible for modifications based on religious training and belief, or conscientious objection arising from a deeply held moral or ethical code.
-Is not required to belong to a specific church or religion, follow a particular theology or belief, or to have had religious training in order to qualify.
-May submit, but is not required to provide, an attestation from a religious or other type of organization, as well as other evidence to establish eligibility.

Although the U.S. has a voluntary military without a draft, meaning citizens are not currently required by law to serve, these new exemptions are highly alarming should the country need to call on its citizens for defense in the future. The United States has always allowed for exceptions to combat based on religious convictions, the Quakers are one example. However, Quakers have found different roles, i.e. as medics, inside the military to aid in the country’s defense. This rule change allows naturalized citizens to refuse service altogether.

It should be noted the Islamic terrorist Mohammad Youssuf Abdulazeez, who killed four Marines and a Navy sailor in Chattanooga last week, was a naturalized citizen.


Meanwhile, The Little Sisters of the Poor’s rights of conscience are being bullied.

I don’t even recognize my country anymore.

How did we get to a point where an American President removes the oath of allegiance to America?  Freedom doesn’t come free.  It must be defended.  With arms, if necessary.  This is insane.

Harvard Law Grad-in-Chief "Law, Shmaw"

Simply enforcing the law may mean inflicting pain on families who are just trying to do the right thing by their children ~ President Obama at the National Hispanic Prayer Breakfast this morning.

Splendid. By that logic, we shouldn’t prosecute any parent for anything. Steal diapers? G’head. Steal formula? Help yourself. Steal an iPad for your kid’s education? Knock yourself out.

It’s for the children.

SCR*W the law, says America’s Commander-in-Chief… Unless you’re caucasian with American citizenship, or someone who actually waited in line and naturalized LEGALLY.