7/10/2014 = IRS JUSTICE!

I slept in this fine Saturday morning in June.

Who knew it was Christmas??????

I got up this morning and what do I see before me in the very news first story I click?  The beautiful black visage of one Emmett Sullivan – THE FEDERAL JUDGE WHO WILL PUT LERNER, HOLDER, AND GOD-WILLING, OBAMA IN HANDCUFFS!!!!!  Long story short:  via a PRIVATELY fought lawsuit in the District over those “missing” emails, the case will come before Judge Sullivan on July 10th.  Judge Sullivan, educated at Howard fercryingoutloud, appointed by Clinton, and because he has that beautiful black skin & pedigree UTTERLY ABOVE ACCUSATIONS of… wait for it… “RAAAAAAACIST”… can appoint… wait for it… A SPECIAL PROSECTOR!!!!!! to HOUND THOSE BASTARDS STRAIGHT INTO THE TONGS OF THE HOT HELL THEY SO RICHLY DESERVE!!!!!!!! I am so RIDICULOUSLY happy about this I can’t even describe it.  And to top it all off, my husband and I are going out on a date tonight to a new Mexican place! AND, just as a bonus, Judge Sullivan will scare the living daylights out of that tribe of scum July 10th, one day before my birthday!!!!!

Life is very, very, very, good!

See the good news in its entirety via The New York Observer below!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

BREAKING: Meet Emmet Sullivan, IRS Judge Who Once Sicced a Special Prosecutor on DOJ

Lerner, Holder, Obama: Are You Packing Your Bags?
Americans are appalled over the false testimony of four consecutive IRS Commissioners, Lois Lerner’s countless acts of malfeasance, and the IRS’s targeting of conservative groups and specific individuals, among them Senator Grassley. The ultimate outrage came over the lame, intellectually insulting assertions that all of the most relevant emails have gone missing from multiple IRS computers at the same time.

Today, Judicial Watch found a federal judge who has the integrity and fortitude to seek Justice—and this isn’t his first whack at the Department of Justice either. Enter Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge for the District of Columbia. Mark July 10 in RED on your calendars.

Now, “Internal Revenue Service officials will have to explain to a federal judge July 10 why the tax agency didn’t inform the court that Lois Lerner’s emails had been lost,” the Washington Examiner reports.

Earlier today, attorneys for Judicial Watch sought a courtroom status conference “as soon as possible to discuss the IRS’s failure to fulfill its duties to this court under the law, as well as other ramifications of this lawsuit.” It took Judge Sullivan just a few hours to grant the hearing.

Now the IRS will have to talk to Judge Sullivan about all this—and he has the power to do something about it.

Judge Sullivan is the judge who held federal prosecutors in contempt, dismissed an unjust indictment against a United States Senator, and publicly excoriated the Department of Justice. He also had the moral conviction, courage and gumption to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Justice Department and the individual prosecutors.

The IRS, the White House, and the DOJ have a lot of explaining to do (and some emails to locate). The Washington Examiner reports that “No mention was made in that production of the lost Lerner emails, even though the original Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed in May 2013 specifically sought them. Judicial Watch further noted that ‘although IRS had knowledge of the missing Lois Lerner emails and of the other IRS officials, it materially omitted any mention of the missing records’ in an April 30 status update on its document production.”

Emmet G. Sullivan, a graduate of Howard University and Howard Law who was appointed by President Clinton, is one of the heroes of my new book, Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice. Judge Sullivan ordered an independent investigation of the Department of Justice, which revealed its corrupted prosecution of United States Senator Ted Stevens.

In the book, I write, “An experienced trial judge, Sullivan was a distinguished man and widely held in high regard. He was no ordinary federal judge; he had worked hard all his life on several different courts and had been appointed by three presidents representing both political parties. . . . He had great respect for the rule of law and strived to apply it equally and fairly in all cases in his courtroom.”

In the Stevens case, Judge Sullivan publicly upbraided the government lawyers before an overflow courtroom, “In nearly 25 years on the bench, I’ve never seen anything approaching the mishandling and misconduct that I’ve seen in this case. . . . When the government does not meet its obligations to turn over evidence, the system falters.”

Judge Sullivan was taking the extraordinary step of appointing a special prosecutor. He chose highly respected DC attorney Henry Schuelke III to investigate the prosecutors for possible criminal charges. The judge ordered the department to preserve all of its files, electronic correspondence—everything—and cooperate fully in the investigation, including providing Schuelke access to investigative files and all witnesses.

Yesterday, Lois Lerner’s troubles seemed so far away, goes the old song. Now it looks as though they’re here to stay. . . .

Emmet G. Sullivan is one judge who knows a cover-up when he sees one. He has seen this movie before. On July 10, someone should sell admission to the courtroom and set up concession booths outside.

Sidney Powell worked in the Department of Justice for 10 years and was lead counsel in more than 500 federal appeals. She served nine US Attorneys from both political parties and is the author of  Licensed to Lie: Exposing Corruption in the Department of Justice.

The Fast & Furious investigation? It's not that Agent Terry was killed. It's because I'm black.

From this morning’s New York Times:

“…Mr. Holder said he believed that a few — the ‘more extreme segment’ — were motivated by animus against Mr. Obama and that he served as a stand-in for him. ‘This is a way to get at the president because of the way I can be identified with him,’ he said, ‘both due to the nature of our relationship and, you know, the fact that we’re both African-American.'”

Wow. Wouldn’t want to train the mind-blowing, gargantuan, damned near biblical power of your shared narcissism on a little self-reflection & personal responsibility there, wouldja Eric-the-Great? Bam-Bam the Destroyer?

Hmm?

Jeezuz… What does it take to get these people to understand that (Read this s-l-o-w-l-y if you are an Eric Holder acolyte) A-N  A-M-E-R-I-C-A-N  A-G-E-N-T  I-S  D-E-A-D.  He-was-your-employee.  You-should-be-unhappy-aggrieved-worried-activated to be sure the mistakes that led to his death are rectified and not repeated.

Hello???

If you’re not eating breakfast and can stomach it, the story is here.

Guilty Demeanor

I watched all of Eric Holder’s testimony before congress yesterday. (I know.  I know…)

If we are to believe him, we must believe that he did not know that his agents were walking guns across an international border and he literally didn’t get the memo.  We are also to believe that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who should have been consulted since it does, in fact, involve another country, was not consulted.  We are to believe Holder when he says he never spoke to her about it, nor to DHS Secretary Napolitano, nor to the President.

We have at least one, possibly two dead American border agents involving guns from this operation.  We have at least 200 dead Mexicans from these weapons, as well.  Nobody denies this.

We are to believe that if Felipe Calderon called up Obama and said “Hey, Barack, buddy, thanks for the State Dinner, man, but your people walked guns over the border and they’re killing my people,” and given all of this, the only possible reaction the President could have had to the Mexican president would be “Whah?  I don’t know what you’re talking about, hombre.”

Had it not been for Sheryl Atkisson’s singularly spectacular reporting blowing the lid off this unbelievable scandal, Obama, if we are to believe Holder’s testimony, would have been utterly clueless if the phone had rung…  Obama should be white-hot p*ssed off that his A.G. left him so vulnerable!  Quite apart from the awfulness of it on it’s face!

And there’s Holder’s guilty demeanor.  If all of this were true he should be white-hot p*ssed off, too, and heads would be rolling. Instead, not a single person has been fired, and a few of the people directly involved have been promoted.  And Holder is smug, arrogant, and deflective.

Not the demeanor of an innocent man.

Grrr…

I was messing around with the permalinks settings and bolluxed up the blog.

Yes.  It looks funny.

I’m off to dinner, then will be back to address it.

GRRRR….

UPDATE Friday, November 11, 2011 6:42am: I bolluxed up the blog last night, still haven’t fixed it, and will do it, but I just saw something so jaw-droppingly STUPID I had to post it – even on my po’ bwoke blog.  (My babies, my twins, are 13 today, 11-11-11, so I may not even get to fix it for sure until Sunday, given our birthday event schedule which started last night and goes all the way through Sunday, but I’m hoping I can restore it to it’s epic beauty before then! 😉  )

Okay!  The STUPID thing:  Perhaps you’ve heard a new batch of Nixon tapes was released.  This isn’t, in itself, especially notable, because this has happened before – BUT – some of the tapes were Grand Jury testimony.  Grand Jury testimony doesn’t ever have to be released, unless the Attorney General decides that it’s of ‘such historical value’ it can be.

Eric Holder has just released just such a batch.

I learned about it watching a Politico reporter on MSNBC just now.  I ACTUALLY saw The Politico reporter have the words form in his mouth, and then speak them, that Eric Holder didn’t *have* to release this Nixon Grand Jury testimony, but did it because it was of such historical significance, AND BLOW RIGHT PAST that thought and go on to just discuss the tapes themselves.  OMG…

NOTHING?  THE REPORTER BONE IN HIS HEAD HAS NOT A SPECK OF CURIOUSITY AS TO THE POSSIBILITY THAT HOLDER HAS OTHER MOTIVES? JUST THAT HE’S DOING IT OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF HIS HEART??

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

THIS SCANDAL-RIDDEN, ISSA-HUNTED, BLOW-OFF SUBPOENAS A.G. would, evidently, JUST OUT OF THE GOODNESS OF HIS HEART AND ASSUMED PART-TIME HOBBY AS AN AMATEUR HISTORIAN…

RELEASE THESE NIXON TAPES?  TO HELP MANKIND?

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?

The lack of curiosity on the part of this reporter is, to me, akin to not ducking when you see an asteroid incoming.  It’s a BASIC FRIGGING INSTINCT that has to be BRED or SOMEHOW SOCIALIZED out of you TO NO LONGER EXIST.  It VIOLATES the NATURAL ORDER OF THINGS.

He should not only be FIRED, he should be ASHAMED of himself.

(I think it was Politico’s Mike Mullen, but I’m not 110% sure.)

 

 

 

Hola? Barack?

An imaginary phone call between Felipe Calderon & Barack Obama over Fast & Furious:

Hola, Barack, Felipe here.  Listen, 200 of my people are dead because Holder sent a bunch of guns down here.  What are you gonna do about it?  Whah?  You didn’t know about it?  Barack, that makes you either a liar or too incompetent to hold the office you hold, so which is it amigo?  We’ve got an international crisis here.  You’re sending guns into my country and they’re being used to kill my people.  I could maybe understand you not being outraged about 200 dead Mexicans, but 2 of your own men are dead on your own soil because your stupid gun program put two in their hats.  So which is it, Barack?  Liar?  Or Incompetent?