(See UPDATE below!)
*sigh*
.
It’s soooooo predictable. I mean… Every damned time. E-v-e-r-y s-i-n-g-l-e s-t-i-n-k-i-n-g d-a-m-n-e-d t-i-m-e the very people the do-gooders doo-doo their good-on get doo’d-doo’d on. (Or to quote our faux intellectual President who couldn’t string together a single elegantly wrought sentence if his life depended on it: “wee-wee’d up”).
.
Even liberals who are anti-gun are protesting the stupid gun-owner map this little rag suburban NY paper put up on the ‘net. Know why? Because the NON-gun owners are now targeted as being unprotected. Included in this population are the wives & children of prison guards who are now being threatened with harm while their husbands are at work (thugs talk, even in prison, with their thug buddies on the outside – duh). Also threatened are women hiding from abusive husbands. They also are now outed as NOT having arms, thus ripe for a fresh beating – or killing. The list of innocents now targeted for harm is long and the crooks are openly thanking the paper for doing it.
.
Way to go.
.
I left the comment below at NYT this morning. I can’t believe they published it. (UPDATE: Judging from some of the replies posted to it, the sarcasm was utterly lost on them, both NYT readers & NYT comment editors alike. Oy.) Or maybe they’re just trying to save their own jobs if their own paper does something equally as felony stupid.
.
.
BTW: Judge Napolitano gives the best explanation of why this is wrong I’ve yet heard here.
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
UPDATE, SAT JAN 12: Hah! Seems someone else had the same idea and outed these morons: “Journalists REJECT Personal ‘Gun-Free’ Zone Signs”!
.