The man who produced NPR’s “Learn to Speak Tea Bag” won a Pulitzer today. What’s wrong with that? Am I just humorless? Thin-skinned? Jealous? Not even close. Not the issue. Not by a long shot.

Late last fall NPR, National Public Radio, funded by your tax dollars launched a wholly incorrect cheap shot at Tea Party “Learn to Speak TeaBag” (“Tea bag” being a crude sexual reference). It went viral on the internet, was looped on MSNBC and reported on by Fox.  Let me be clear: I have no troubles with anybody saying anything about anybody – unless it’s taxpayer dollars being used to propogandize the very Americans who fund their payroll– Then I got a problem because it is a fundamental abuse of the public trust and federal power.


It’s the flip side of the same coin which resulted in Obama’s book club buddy Chavez imprisoning the head of a TV station, the last standing media outlet to dare to criticize him, which if we were to produce our own little cartoon video would translate to mere fact telling. That was three weeks ago and I’ve not heard word one from Obama condemning that action. Not a peep from him or anyone in his administration taking up the torch of liberty like every other president before him who has witnessed such abuse. Neither, parenthetically, did “the NPR buck stops here” President Obama admonish the agency he technically oversees for the cheap shot at tax payer expense. We can only presume that because the propaganda was a net gain to him, he had no problem with using federal government dollars to produce it.


Obama’s negligence, yet again, to urge a higher standard of dissent, with or without abusive use of tax dollars, is not new. His community organizing arm, OFA, enlisted the help of the tax payer funded National Endowment of the Arts to propagandize on behalf of his agenda… More on that later.


Like the Nobel, the Pulitzer has fallen into irretrievable disrepute. It’s so far gone beyond merit and into pure inbred, intellectual masturbation, it’s barely worth getting upset anymore…