I.R.S. Playing w/FIRE

The New York Observer’s Sydney Powell posts another brilliant, insightful article (below) on the IRS and Judge Sullivan.  The second to last paragraph asks obvious questions I’m ashamed I didn’t ask myself, long ago…

~~~~

Deadline: Judge Emmet Sullivan Lays Down the Law

Fed up with IRS stalling, Judge Sullivan has given the agency just one week to provide straight answers about the missing Lois Lerner emails.

 Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Photo Credit DOMINIC BRACCO II)

On behalf of the country, Judge Emmet Sullivan is pounding the IRS and appears as unsatisfied as most of America with the agency’s stalling, side-stepping, neglect, arrogance, and cavalier attitude toward its legally required record-retention responsibilities. Late yesterday afternoon, Judge Sullivan entered an order that demands answers to a lot more questions.

The IRS’s filing in Judge Sullivan’s court Monday evidenced no interest in finding the emails all of us know are out there somewhere. The fact that the IRS took thirty days to file its meager declarations, which actually said less than it had disclosed to Congress, is truly insulting. The agency better take Judge Sullivan seriously—and fast—or he’s the one who will be furious. Have IRS officials Kane and Koskinen still not reviewed what this fearless enforcer of the law did to the last Department of Justice prosecutors who played games with the truth in his courtroom?

The Judge entered an order at 4:20 p.m. yesterday giving the IRS only until August 22 — one week! — to:

“(1) provide information about its efforts, if any, to recover missing Lois Lerner emails from alternate sources (i.e., Blackberry, iPhone, iPad);

(2) provide additional information explaining the IRS’s policy of tracking inventory through use of bar code property tags, including whether component parts, such as hard drives, receive a bar code tag when serviced. If individual components do not receive a bar code tag, provide information on how the IRS tracks component parts, such as hard drives, when being serviced;

(3)provide information about the IRS’s policy to degauss hard drives, including whether the IRS records whose hard drive is degaussed, either by tracking the employee’s name or the particular machine with which the hard drive was associated; and

(4) provide information about the outside vendor who can verify the IRS’s destruction policies concerning hard drives.”

The IRS is represented by Department of Justice attorneys. Do they not read the news, the latestbooks, or the law? This column has tried to warn them repeatedly that, like Toto, they’re not in Kansas any more. They are in the federal courtroom of a real Article III judge who has powers they should bloody well know not to ignore—the same kind wielded by Judge John Sirica, whose integrity and persistence in dealing with the Watergate case led to the resignation of Richard M. Nixon.

This is the same Emmet Sullivan who appointed a special prosecutor and initiated criminal contempt proceedings and a full investigation of the Department of Justice attorneys who played unethical and dishonest games in the prosecution of United States Senator Ted Stevens.

Federal Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (Public Domain)

Someone in DOJ or the IRS better find those emails, fast, or this Judge will do it for them and they’ll just think they were caught up in a Category V tornado—or wish they had been and carried off to Oz instead. Judge Sullivan will keep on until he finds the man behind the curtain.

One of the things I can’t help but continue to wonder is, if the emails and all the information truly were not recoverable from the Lerner hard drive, why did the hard drive have to be “degaussed” and destroyed to “protect taxpayer privacy”? And why did someone testify to Congress that an IRS IT expert said it should be given to an outside vendor to retrieve the messages—and instead, the hard drive was degaussed and shredded?

With each turn, the IRS has raised more questions than it has answered. But this time it’s not the media and the citizens doing the asking. They’ve now got a week to answer to a judge.

 

IRS & O’s Terrorist Bro

The link to the article below, IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother by Eileen F. Toplansky at American Thinker was broken for most of the morning. I have never had this experience at this site, and I read it several times a day. After six years of links going missing, getting corrupted, and websites & even search engines being scrubbed, tweaked, and manipulated, I don’t don’t think it’s paranoid to assume the break was not an accident. Given this, I took it upon myself to just cut and paste it, in its entirety here. Too little good, sourced, solid writing has been done about Barack Obama’s familial (and non-familial) ties to criminals and terrorists. Walid Shoebat and a few others have been tireless, but howling in the wind, I’m afraid. Normally cutting & pasting someone’s work would be a bad thing. In this case, I regard it as helping the cause via safe-keeping. Let me be clear: I had nothing to do with this article, don’t know a soul involved/mentioned in it, and stand to gain absolutely nothing by preserving it here. I just don’t want it going down the digital rabbit hole.

IRS and Barack’s Half-Brother

In April 2012, Indiana’s news station WTHR conducted a “Tax Loophole” investigation that attracted the attention of millions of Americans.  They discovered “a massive tax loophole that provides billions of dollars in tax credits to undocumented workers.”

Although a program known as the Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) was supposed to be “primarily used by undocumented workers to follow the law and file income taxes in the United States” the ongoing IRS scandal linked “ITIN fraud to billions in lost taxpayer dollars” and the IRS was “forced to reform the ITIN program at the start of 2013.”

Didn’t quite happen.

As is the usual scenario in this administration, the IRS pulled another fast one because according to Patrick Howley, the “Internal Revenue Service [has] quietly changed regulations to allow more undocumented immigrants to keep their taxpayer status through a program that is rife with fraud and abuse.”  In short, “ensuring that only qualified individuals receive an ITIN” is a dim to non-existent prospect.

In addition, in the IRS ongoing case known as True the Vote(TTV) v. IRS the court “rejected an attempt by the conservative Tea Party group to have the court appoint a forensics expert to find Lois Lerner’s missing emails and documents.” The basis for this decision was the judge’s ruling that no “irreparable harm” had occurred.

But in January 2014 Walid Shoebat unearthed the information that a jihadist was granted USA tax exempt status 26-2461343 by Lois Lerner while conservative groups and Jewish groups were thwarted in their attempts to gain this same status. And this is where things begin to get very interesting.

Who might this jihadist be?  None other than Barack Hussein Obama’s brother Malik Obama.

The Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) was established in 2008 by Abon’go Malik Obama, the half-brother of the President of the United States.  According to Discover the Networks, “Abon’go, a Kenyan-born Muslim, created the foundation in memory of his and President Obama’s biological father.”  But

...from 2008-11, BHOF operated illegally as a nonprofit group and falsely claimed tax-exempt status—for which it had not yet formally applied. The foundation finally submitted its 2010 application for nonprofit, tax-exempt status on May 23, 2011; seven days later, it submitted its filings for 2008 and 2009. Within just one month of these filings—on June 26, 2011—Lois Lerner, the senior official who headed the IRS's tax-exempt organizations office, signed paperwork granting tax-exempt status to BHOF.

Consider that many conservative groups were intentionally forced by Lerner’s office to wait more than three years for the same status. Yet Obama’s African relative sails through without a hitch. Quite a stark contrast.

That is infuriating on the surface but consider the greater ramifications.

Eight months ago, Shoebat unearths the fact that Malik Obama is Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO) of Sudan’s Omar Al-Bashir, an international criminal who is wanted on seven counts for genocide and crimes against humanity.  Barack’s half-brother is officially a fundraiser for the IDO.  Thus, Malik Obama helps to lead an organization that “collects funds and sends them directly to Hamas.”

In fact, “IDO has raised funds for Gaza relief.”  These so-called relief funds have been linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and an Al-Qaeda bank that was founded by Osama bin Laden.”

Consequently, Shoebat insists that Cleta Mitchell, the attorney for True the Vote should publicize the Malik Obama connection.  This would “show that, indeed, the IRS aided and abetted terror funding” and would demolish Judge Reggie Walton’s point that “irreparable harm” did not occur.

Considering all this, it is not particularly surprising when Barack Hussein Obama favors Hamas over the Israelis during the current attacks on the Jewish state.  A recent Gulf News report of June 2014 “reveals cooperation between Washington and Brotherhood.”  As a result the shift toward “Islamic ascendancy” is flourishing.

Armin Rosen at Business Insider maintains that the United States is funding a designated terror group and that Obama is bending U.S. “rules to subsidize a group” that is considered a terrorist organization. The nefarious connections appear to be quite deep and interconnected.  Following the money and familial connections with Obama explains a great deal about the 44th President’s allegiances.

IRS continues to stonewall; Americans cannot get straight answers from their government leaders, but, to be sure, illegals and terrorists are riding high in Barack Hussein Obama’s America.

The scandals simmer; Christians continue to be murdered worldwide; Yesidi genocide is ongoing, and screams of “kill the Jews” reverberate, but on Saturday, August 9, 2014, Obama “fled Washington for his familiar spot on Martha’s Vineyard for a two-week summer vacation.”  We shall, I am sure, hear all about his ice cream stops and golf exploits.

Eileen can be reached at middlemarch18@gmail.com

~~~

Bricks & Glass & Cloistered Corruption

Okay… Mike and I get married in my childhood parish, St. Frances, on September 11th (1993).  It was 8 years before the attacks but there you go.

Then, 3 years after the attacks, the church closes down (not due to the attacks but to the headlines that broke just after the millennium that dozens and dozens of priest had, for decades, been raping hundreds of little boys, helped by church who – helpfully – moved them from parish to parish for fresh ass, I mean, to hide the problem.  Parenthetically, my childhood priest was one of them. How do we know? The Boston Herald was kind enough to print his picture on their front page.).

Now St. Frances is on the home page of Fox News – one of the world’s most widely seen home pages – because life-long congregants have been keeping 24 hour vigil – for 10 straight years – trying to keep the Diocese from selling it off to pay for the sex crimes of their priests.

Blue-hairs sleeping on hard wooden pews for ten years to fight against a bunch of corrupt, cloistered politicians operating under the color of God. Ya gotta love ’em.

But I’m thinking a walk in the woods and contemplating the Glory of God might be the way to go… Fighting over a building with a bureaucracy which knowingly aided and abetted f*cking little boys for decades by simply shuffling them off to other parishes doesn’t seem to me to be worth it, but, whatever.  I get it.  I get the good part.  What these folks, so much like my lovely mother, see when the see “the church.”  And I do, too.  I see the millions they’ve helped with their good, charitable works.  I do.  But I just can’t be a part of a hierarchy that effectively endorses a grown man sticking his erect penis into the anus of a 10 year old boy.

Then, to pay for it, to pay for their decades of knowingly shuffling boy-diddling priests from parish to parish so they could diddle some more, telling little old ladies who sleep on a wooden church pew for 10 entire years to f*ck off.

I just can’t do it.

But here‘s the story.

For auld lang syne.

Fox St Frances Story

10-year fight over waterfront church pits Boston Archdiocese against parishioners

  • StFrances.jpg

    St. Frances Xavier Cabrini Church, pictured above, was closed in October 2004 by the Boston Archdiocese, citing financial difficulties and a decline in Mass attendance.

For more than half a century, St. Frances Xavier Cabrini Church has represented the heart and soul of Boston’s so-called “Irish Riviera,” according to parishioners who have spent the last decade defying the archdiocese’s bid to close the narthex doors for good.

To the Archdiocese of Boston, a dwindling congregation and a shortage of priests, among other factors, marked the church for closure in October 2004, which the Vatican supported. But congregants, who have maintained a constant presence in the church ever since and conducted ongoing services with laymen officiating, say it is the 30 acres of prime, ocean-view real estate the church sits on that has the hierarchy looking to sell.

And they believe the sweat equity they’ve poured into the church over the years makes it theirs, not the archdiocese’s.

“This is our church,” Jon Rogers, an occupation organizer and a founder of the nonprofit support group, “The Friends of St. Frances Xavier Cabrini,” told FoxNews.com. “We have self-supported it for decades. Every Sunday the pastor would say, ‘We need some repairs here. We need a new carpet. We need a new roof. It’s your church.'”

Archdiocese spokesman Terry Donilon said the decision to shut the doors in 2004 was part of a larger parish closure and he cited a decline in Mass attendance and a “dramatic” drop in the number of priests.

But the congregation tells a very different story — claiming St. Frances had 3,000 registered parishioners in 2004 who were providing enough money to not only support the church but also fund the building of a school and church in India.

“We are the highest percentage of Irish Catholics of any town in America,” said Rogers, who said the church was always thriving.

Donilon offered a much lower number, telling FoxNews.com that the average weekly Mass attendance in 2003 stood at 804. He said that year the church held 26 baptisms, 52 First Communions, 49 Confirmations, 8 weddings and 22 funerals.

Since the announcement was made to close the church in October 2004, congregants have held vigils in shifts, 24 hours a day, seven days a week — sleeping on the floor and in pews and holding Sunday service, during which the occupants recite prayers, listen to Bible readings and receive consecrated hosts secretly provided by area priests, according to Rogers. The gatherings are lay-led services, he explained, and the Eucharist is given to the congregation by Eucharistic ministers.

The congregants say that between 100 and 200 people attend weekly Sunday service and that hundreds more are present for special events, like those held during the major Catholic holidays — a claim that Donilon strongly refutes.

“The last Easter service had approximately 700 people,” Rogers said.

He also noted that parishioners have maintained the 55-year-old building over the years, spending thousands of dollars on repairs and renovations, like painting and new woodwork, as well as purchasing a new furnace.

“We were told for over 50 years that this was our church.”

– Jon Rogers, congregant of St. Frances Xavier Cabrini church

Parishioners voted unanimously on Sunday to request that Pope Francis investigate the Boston Archdiocese’s handling of funds, said Rogers, whose group believes the archdiocese is flush with cash and has no need to close the church. They charge church leaders want to sell the valuable property — worth as much as $1 million per acre by some estimates — to replenish the coffers that were greatly depleted through massive clergy sex abuse settlements.

The U.S. Catholic Church has paid close to $2.8 billion in legal costs related to clergy sex abuse cases, according to a 2013 report by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.

“We were told for over 50 years that this was our church,” Rogers said, “And it was our church until the very day when the archdiocese said, ‘It’s now ours and we need to liquify it to pay for the sins of our priests.'”

Although a Vatican court ruled in June that the Boston Archdiocese, which owns the property, is permitted to sell or re-use the building, Rogers and canon law consultant Peter Borres argue that a subsequent appeal is necessary because, they claim, the latest public financial report on the Boston Archdioceses’s website reveals a $41 million surplus.

Donilon vehemently denied the charge that the church was being closed so the property could be sold to pay off prior legal settlements.

“We are not selling churches to pay for the legal fees of the sex abuse cases,” said Donilon, who also denied the archdiocese is sitting on a surplus. He said the $41 million figure cited by Rogers is “misleading,” because it represents a cumulative total for 288 parishes, and is not money the archdiocese can divert to a struggling parish.

“With regards to the surplus question, money in the bank accounts of parishes are solely for those parishes,” Donilon said. “By Church law, these assets cannot be used at the discretion of the archdiocese.”

“No plans” have been discussed about what will be done with the property, which sits about a half mile from the Atlantic Ocean, Donilon added. He called the claim by congregants that the property is to be sold to a condominium developer false.

“We don’t know what we’re going to do with the property,” he said.

Donilon said church leaders will continue to “work for a peaceful resolution,” even if occupants refuse to physically leave the building, though he added, “This will not go on forever — it simply can’t.” He said there are other nearby parishes that would welcome the congregation “with open arms.”

Cardinal Sean P. O’Malley has asked the congregation to ends it occupation of the church and respect the ruling of the Apostolic Signatura, the church’s highest court, which denied their appeal seeking to prevent the sale or repurposing of the building.

“Your participation in the appeals process presumed that you would accept the final decision, even if it were not favorable to your desired outcome,” O’Malley wrote in a July 29 letter. “Now we are simply asking for demonstration of your good faith.”

Rogers said the congregation has requested to buy the structure from the Boston Archdiocese, which turned down the offer.

“That’s not happening,” Donilon said. “What they want to create is not a parish.”

 ~~~